TickerTrac

AI-powered thesis monitoring

Keep your thesis. Know what changed.

Say why you own a stock, in your own words. TickerTrac's AI reads the filings, earnings calls and news so you don't have to, and tells you when something changes your reason. You inspect the sources and keep every version.

One company free forever. No card or brokerage connection required. Works for one company or a broader theme.

  1. 1.Say why you own it
  2. 2.Test it against evidence on file
  3. 3.See what changes it
  4. 4.Revise and keep every version

Try TickerTrac · No signup

See how AI checks an investment thesis

Try NVIDIA using your own reasoning or an example. You don’t need to own it. We check what supports it, weakens it, or stays uncertain in the evidence on file.

Sent once to our AI provider. Kept only if you choose to continue with this draft.0/280

Cloudflare runs an anti-abuse check. Your reason is not sent to Cloudflare.

Loading secure verification…

Latest assessed development: Aug 26, 2026

Evidence updates are pending; this is the last available assessment.

What this check covers

Retained issuer documents since the original example and news naming NVIDIA from the past seven days, checked against the approved NVIDIA thesis. This is a bounded evidence check; it does not claim complete market coverage.

Inspect the evidence. See what remains uncertain. You decide whether your thesis changes.

Example · a saved NVIDIA thesis, months later

Catch up on your theses.

A shared example. It does not change with what you typed above.

Historical review ·

NVIDIA (NVDA) · Thesis version 2

Effect in this review: Strengthened

AI infrastructure growth can outrun margin pressure.

See what affected NVDA

All three reviewed factors strengthen, but the thesis still depends on NVIDIA delivering its Q3 outlook while managing supply, mix, and China-related uncertainty.

What changed ·

NVIDIA second-quarter fiscal 2027 results

NVIDIA reported $96.2 billion of Q2 FY27 revenue, $89.0 billion of Data Center revenue, and a 75.0% GAAP gross margin; its Q3 outlook is $108.0 billion of revenue and a 74.0% GAAP gross margin, each with the issuer's stated tolerance.

Appended to version 2 of the thesis. The record above was not rewritten.

Why it matters to this thesis

Revenue and Data Center growth accelerated while GAAP gross margin held at 75.0%, showing that demand scale has so far outweighed the margin pressure embedded in the thesis.

Inspect the sources

Still uncertain

NVIDIA's Q3 outlook assumes no Data Center compute revenue from China; supply availability, product mix, transition costs, and export restrictions could change revenue or gross-margin delivery.

Next checkpoint

NVIDIA's Q3 FY27 results: compare actual revenue with the $108.0 billion outlook and actual GAAP gross margin with the 74.0% outlook, each subject to the issuer's stated tolerance.

Explore the factor-by-factor Historical Replay

What the retained evidence changed—and what it did not

Approved example thesis preserved
Thesis snapshotAug 26, 2026
Evidence observedAug 26, 2026
Impact assessedAug 27, 2026
  1. Quarterly revenue meets or exceeds the low end of NVIDIA's issuer guidance.

    Strengthened

    The SEC-filed release reports $96.2 billion of Q2 FY27 revenue, above the $89.18 billion low end of NVIDIA's prior $91 billion plus-or-minus 2% outlook.

  2. Quarterly GAAP gross margin remains within NVIDIA's issuer-guided range.

    Strengthened

    The SEC-filed release and Form 10-Q report a 75.0% Q2 FY27 GAAP gross margin, within the 74.4% to 75.4% range implied by prior 74.9% plus-or-minus 50-basis-point guidance.

  3. The next-quarter revenue outlook exceeds current-quarter revenue while the low end of GAAP gross-margin guidance remains at or above 73.5%.

    Strengthened

    NVIDIA's Q3 FY27 outlook is $108.0 billion of revenue, above Q2's $96.2 billion, and a 74.0% GAAP gross margin plus or minus 50 basis points, whose low end is 73.5%.

Appended evidence impact

Q2 revenue delivery, GAAP gross-margin resilience, and the Q3 revenue-and-margin outlook all strengthen the reviewed publisher-owned thesis.

This applies one retained public thesis snapshot to public evidence. It is not a record of what an investor believed or an alert TickerTrac sent when the evidence was published.

This applies one retained public thesis snapshot to public evidence. It is not a record of what an investor believed or an alert TickerTrac sent when the evidence was published.

Why keep a record

Your AI remembers the gist. Your thesis lives in the details.

TickerTrac keeps the words you approved and every dated version.

You wrote
Services growth offsets flat iPhone units while Services gross margin stays above 70%.
A summary kept
Positive on Apple Services.
Illustration: the 70% condition is gone, so no later result can test it.

VRT · A published thesis revision

See how the reasoning changed.

These are two consecutive approved versions of TickerTrac's published thesis. The publisher supplied the explanation and selected the evidence later; this does not establish what caused the revision or record an investor's past belief.

Before · Version 2

Approved

Power and thermal capacity is the binding constraint on data-center buildout, which makes the infrastructure supplier less cyclical than the compute it cools -- backlog converts even if chip demand pauses. The thesis fails if backlog turns out to track orders rather than lead them.

After · Version 4

Approved

Vertiv's power and cooling business can benefit from AI data-center constraints, provided orders become revenue at healthy margins. The next test is whether third-quarter sales and adjusted operating margin meet the company's July guidance; material cancellations or project delays would weaken the thesis.
The publisher’s explanation

Recorded later ·

The earlier wording overstated protection from a spending slowdown. Vertiv discloses that customers can defer or reduce orders, so backlog is not assured revenue. The revised thesis keeps the power-and-cooling opportunity but tests delivery against stated sales and margin guidance. This correction follows a review of existing disclosures; it does not signal a newly observed downturn.

Evidence selected by the publisher (3)

These sources were available to TickerTrac before the revised wording was recorded.

The rest of the loop

Set it up once. Come back when the evidence changes.

Type it or say it aloud, review how the interview organized your meaning, and approve the reason before it is saved.

  • Ask

    Question the evidence directly. “Did Services gross margin stay above 70% last quarter?” Sourced answers that keep follow-ups connected to the same thesis version and source context.

  • Revise

    Change your view deliberately. Keep the earlier thesis, say why your view changed, and attach the evidence you say prompted it. Review and confirm each new version before it is saved.

  • Reapply

    Find where else the reasoning fits. Match finds other companies that fit your reason or theme and explains each. Free includes one a month.

Simple pricing

Start free. Pay for breadth.

Free

$0 forever

No card

Monitor one company with sourced evidence and preserved history.

  • 1 company monitored
  • 1 broader theme
  • 15 research questions · 2 past-evidence tests a month

Investor

$19 per month

More breadth
  • Or $180 per year ($15/month, billed annually)
  • 25 companies monitored
  • 5 broader themes
  • 150 research questions · 20 past-evidence tests a month

Pro

$49 per month

More research
  • Or $468 per year ($39/month, billed annually)
  • 60 companies monitored
  • 25 broader themes
  • 400 research questions · 50 past-evidence tests a month

All plans include Ask, Explain, Replay, Match, and alerts, plus shared template matches. Each Company thesis or linked theme uses one monitoring slot per watchlist (Free 2, Investor 50, Pro 120). Intraday checks; choose Daily, Weekly or in-app-only delivery. Research allowances reset monthly (UTC).

Prices are confirmed at checkout. Taxes may apply.

Stop relying on memory—yours or your AI’s.

Editorial by email.

Public theses, open questions, next checkpoints.

Get the Editorial review